- assessment is more objective and consistent
- helps the testers focus on clarifying criteria into specific terms
- clearly describes to the developer how her work will be evaluated and what is expected
- provides benchmarks against which the developers can measure progress
Criteria assessed through system use | Level 1 Beginning | Level 2 Developing | Level 3 Standard | Level 4 Above Standard |
---|---|---|---|---|
Basic features are functioning | Few features work correctly the first time used | Many features do not operate. Some missing features required to complete work | Most features operate. Workarounds available to complete work. | All features work correctly every time they are used. |
Speed of operations | Many features never completed. | Most features completed before user lost interest. | Most features completed in 3 seconds or less. | All features completed in 3 seconds or less. |
Correct operation | Few features result successfully without an error condition. | Some features end with an error condition. | Most features complete successfully. | All features complete successfully. |
Ruberics can take many forms but typically offer the following:
- focus on measuring stated objectives (performance, behavior or quality)
- use a range to rate performance
- contain specific performance characteristics arranged in levels indicating the degree to which a standard has been met.
No comments:
Post a Comment